Exposure to NATO and NATO+ ally defence and cyber defence spending.
NATO defence budgets are set to grow
Despite record spending on defence in 2024, NATO’s collective outlay remains only 2.7% of members’ combined GDP. Substantial and sustained increases in defence spending will be needed for NATO to reach its 5% of GDP target.
Cyber defence is now mission critical
In the 21st century, cyber defence is a core pillar of national security. NATO’s inclusion of cyber and network security in new spending targets reflects the growing threat of geopolitically motivated attacks on critical infrastructure.
NATO and allied exposure
Invests exclusively in companies domiciled in NATO or NATO-allied countries to ensure alignment with democratic values, geopolitical reliability, and strong regulatory oversight. This approach avoids exposure to defence firms in adversarial states.
Sources available on request.
Focusing on companies domiciled in NATO or NATO-allied countries ensures alignment with democratic values, geopolitical reliability, and strong regulatory oversight. This approach avoids defence firms in adversarial states.
Future of Defence UCITS ETF (NATO) provides exposure to companies benefiting from rising NATO and NATO-allied defence and cyber defence spending.
Global military expenditure is surging. In 2024, $2.7 trillion was spent on defence – the highest level ever recorded. Military spending per capita is now at its highest since 1990. NATO members have led this trend, increasing their defence spending by 8.9% in 2024 compared to the previous year.
This trend is expected to continue. In 2025, NATO members agreed to raise defence spending to the equivalent of 5% of GDP by 2035. This new target includes 3.5 percentage points allocated to traditional defence, and 1.5 percentage points dedicated to broader categories such as cyber and network security.
The ETF tracks the EQM NATO+ Future of Defence Index. Using a passive, rules-based approach, the index includes companies that derive over 50% of revenues from the manufacture and development of military aircraft and/or defence equipment, or have cyber security operations contracted with a NATO+ member country.
(SOURCE: All stats taken from SIPRI: https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2025-04/2504_fs_milex_2024.pdf )
Key Risks
Thematic ETFs are exposed to a limited number of sectors and thus the investment will be concentrated and may experience high volatility. Investors’ capital is fully at risk and may not get back the amount originally invested. Exchange rates can have a positive or negative effect on returns. The value of equities and equity-related securities can be affected by daily stock and currency market movements. When you invest in ETFs, your capital is at risk.
Rebalance Calendar
NAV History
Source: HANetf, data as of 31.08.2026. Please note that all performance figures are showing net data. Performance before inception is based on back-tested data. Back-testing is the process of evaluating an investment strategy by applying it to historical data to simulate what the performance of such a strategy would have been. Back-tested data does not represent actual performance and should not be interpreted as an indication of actual or future performance. Past performance for the index is in USD. Past performance is not an indicator for future results and should not be the sole factor of consideration when selecting a product. Investors should read the prospectus of the Issuer (“Prospectus”) before investing and should refer to the section of the Prospectus entitled “Risk Factors” for further details of risks associated with an investment in this product. If fund is less than 12 months old, YTD field will be calculated since inception. When you invest in ETFs your capital is at risk.
No. of holdings: 60
Data as of 31st March 2025. The figures shown relate to past performance. Past performance is not a reliable indication of current or future results. Maximum on-loan figure may increase or decrease over time. With securities lending there is a risk of loss should the borrower default before the securities are returned, and due to market movements, the value of collateral held has fallen and/or the value of the securities on loan has risen.
Download Collateral Snapshot
Offers end to end AI and data platforms working to improve target identification, logistics and decision making. Integrating defence networks to focus on military data infrastructure to improve operational impact.
Develops advanced defence systems and military vehicles for European and NATO forces. Its capabilities span armoured vehicles, ammunition, air defence systems and electronic solutions supporting modern land warfare and battlefield logistics.
Provides advanced defence, aerospace and security systems for governments and armed forces worldwide. Its capabilities include combat aircraft, naval ships, submarines, electronic warfare and cyber solutions supporting modern military operations.
Index Details
The EQM NATO+ Future of Defence Index (NATONTR) is designed to track the performance of global companies generating revenues from NATO and non-NATO ally defence and cyber defence spending.
Starting Universe
The EQM NATO+ Future of Defence Index (NATONTR) follows a published, rules-based methodology that seeks to invest in holdings that have the following characteristics, among others:
Screening
Rebalance
The index is adjusted quarterly.
Defence exposure generally refers to investment exposure to companies whose revenues are linked to national security, military capability or related technologies. This can include areas such as defence equipment, aerospace systems, naval and land platforms, surveillance, secure communications and cyber security. The exact exposure will depend on the index, strategy or fund methodology being used, so investors should review the relevant documentation and holdings before making any decision.
A dedicated defence theme is typically more focused on companies with meaningful defence-related revenues. Broad industrials or aerospace exposure may include companies where defence is only one part of a much wider business mix, alongside commercial aviation, manufacturing, transport, infrastructure or other activities. Investors should therefore look at how companies are selected and weighted, rather than assuming all aerospace or industrial exposure is the same as defence exposure.
Many defence-related companies depend partly or heavily on government customers. Defence budgets can influence demand for military equipment, cyber security, surveillance, communications systems and related services. However, budget commitments do not automatically translate into revenue for individual companies. Contract awards, procurement timelines, production capacity, regulation and political priorities can all affect outcomes.
No. Higher defence budgets may create a more supportive backdrop for parts of the sector, but they do not guarantee stronger revenues, profits or share-price performance for individual companies. Defence procurement can be slow and complex, with spending spread across personnel, operations, maintenance, equipment and technology. Companies also remain exposed to market volatility, currency movements, supply-chain constraints and valuation risk.
NATO spending is relevant because many member states have increased their focus on military readiness, with 31 of the 32 NATO member states committing to investing 5% of GDP on defence and security by 2035. This can support demand for defence equipment, technology and cyber resilience over time. However, NATO-level commitments are implemented by individual countries, and the scale, timing and focus of spending can vary significantly by national budget, policy priority and procurement process.
A NATO-aligned or NATO-screened defence universe generally refers to an investment universe that applies country, customer or revenue-based screening connected to NATO member states and selected allied countries. The aim is to focus exposure on companies linked to NATO and allied defence priorities, rather than taking a broad global defence approach. The exact definition will depend on the methodology, including which countries, activities and exclusions are applied.
Country or alliance screening may help investors understand not only what a company produces, but also the geopolitical context in which it operates. In defence, end customers, export markets and government relationships can be important considerations. Screening can therefore be relevant for investors who want to assess alignment with specific alliances, policy frameworks, ethical views or mandate requirements.
Defence can raise ESG and ethical considerations because the sector is connected to military equipment, national security, conflict, government customers and export controls. Some investors may exclude the sector entirely, while others may distinguish between controversial weapons, national defence, cyber resilience or companies serving allied democracies. Investors should review the methodology, exclusions, holdings and risk disclosures to assess whether the exposure aligns with their own values, policies or mandate.
There is no single answer, as ESG approaches vary by investor, region and mandate. Some ESG frameworks like Article 8 can exclude defence exposure – depending on a fund’s methodology, particularly where controversial weapons like biological/ chemical weapons, cluster munitions or anti-personnel mines are involved. Others may view national security, protection of critical infrastructure and cyber resilience as relevant to social stability and democratic security. The key point is that investors should understand the specific screening rules, exclusions and company exposures rather than relying on a broad label.
Not all defence ETFs contain exposure to cyber defence, but it is becoming an increasingly important allocation in modern defence. Cyber-attacks can target governments, defence systems, energy networks, financial institutions, transport, communications and other critical infrastructure. As a result, modern defence capabilities increasingly include cyber protection, network security, surveillance and secure communications alongside traditional military equipment.
While some conflicts may provide short term boost to defence holdings. The longer-term case for defence rests on the longer-term commitments made by governments rather than any single conflict. As with all investments, defence stocks carry their own risks and past performance during periods of conflict is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Investors should consider their own risks appetite and seek independent financial advice before investing.
Relevant stocks may include both traditional defence contractors and cyber-security companies. Examples include Safran, BAE Systems, Rheinmetall, General Dynamics, RTX, Northrop Grumman, Fortinet, Cisco Systems, Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike. This mix reflects how modern defence exposure can span aircraft, propulsion, missiles, naval systems, land systems, communications, networks and cyber resilience. Investors researching the theme should consider whether companies generate revenue from allied defence budgets, how contracts are linked to government procurement, and how cyber exposure differs from traditional hardware. Key risks include political changes, defence budget timing, export restrictions, valuation risk and ethical considerations around military-related revenues.
Disclaimer: These FAQs have been generated with the assistance of AI and may contain errors or omissions. They are provided for general information only and do not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an invitation to buy or sell any investment.
Explore our expert-written monthly fund reports, periodic reviews, and key insights.
What investors should consider before investing in Defence ETFs in 2026
June 2026
Defence 2.0: How Drones and Cyber are reshaping investments
What does AI mean for cyber defence?
Why cybersecurity and defence may be complementary themes?
February 2026
Ukraine could become the West’s solution for rearmament
March 2026
Iran crisis – four sectors to keep on your radar
From tanks to code: why the next defence boom will be digital
Copper’s less known demand driver: defence
September 2025
Holding case study: Bae Systems
March 2025
Holding case study: Rheinmetall
What would a US withdrawal from NATO mean for European defence?
Europe’s sidelining by US prompts defence spending reality check
February 2025
Will Europe be forced to defend itself alone?
December 2024
Europe rearms for a world of greater geopolitical risk
November 2024
US Election 2024: The Stakes for NATO and the Defence Industry
October 2024
Trump stance will force NATO countries to spend more whether elected or not
May 2024
ESG and defence investing: a balancing act
The fall of Russian defence spending, and the rise of NATO
April 2024
Why investors should consider defence
Global instability – three potential ways to hedge
February 2024
HANetf’s 2024 Outlook
December 2023
Future of Defence Report | August 2026
September 2026
Future of Defence Report | July 2026
July 2026
Future of Defence Report | June 2026
Future of Defence Report | May 2026
May 2026
Future of Defence Report | January 2026
January 2026
Future of Defence Report | October 2025
October 2025
Future of Defence Report | September 2025
Future of Defence Report | July 2025
July 2025
Future of Defence Report | June 2025
June 2025
Future of Defence Report | May 2025
May 2025
Future of Defence Report | April 2025
April 2025
Future of Defence ETF Report | March 2025
Future of Defence Report | Feburary 2025
Future of Defence Report | January 2025
January 2025
Future of Defence Report | December 2024
Future of Defence Report | November 2024
Future of Defence Report | October 2024
Future of Defence Report | September 2024
September 2024
Defence and Aerospace ETF Report | August 2024
August 2024
Defence and Aerospace ETF Report | July 2024
July 2024
Future of Defence Report | June 2024
June 2024
Future of Defence Report | May 2024
Future of Defence ETF Report | Apr 2024
Future of Defence ETF Report | Mar 2024
March 2024
Future of Defence ETF Report | Feb 2024
Future of Defence ETF Monthly Report | November
November 2023
Future of Defence ETF Monthly Report | December
Thematic & Digital Assets Review | H2 2024
Thematic & Digital Assets Review | January – June 2023
July 2023
Thematic & Digital Assets Review | H1 2024
Investing in the Defence Supercycle
Introducing the future of defence ETF – an ETF for a less stable world
The Future of Defence: Cybersecurity & Autonomous Systems
May 2026 |
HANetf co-CEO on bitcoin topping $100,000 and potential for uranium & defence ETFs
December 2024 |
HANetf’s ‘NATO’ ETF celebrates 1 year: Insights from Tom Bailey
July 2024 |
Video | Can investors afford to miss the NATO defence opportunity?
June 2024 |
HANetf launches Future of Defence UCITS ETF
July 2023 |
Get alerts on product updates and strategy insights straight to your inbox.
Morningstar
The 10 Best-Performing Defense ETFs in 2026
The Times
Why it's not too late to put own money in defence
Defence and gold soar, while robotics and platinum rust in 2025
Investors Chronicle
Defence stocks and Auction Technology Group: Markets live blog
MSN
How I generated a 20%+ return in my SIPP in 2025 (and my strategy for 2026)
Citywire
HANetf breaks $9bn AUM with huge YTD flows spike
Money Week
Are defence stocks the new big tech?
The Motley Fool
Up 64% in 2025, is it too late to consider buying BAE Systems shares for defence exposure?
Here’s the FTSE 100 share and the ETF I bought for my SIPP in June!
CNBC
Why fund managers are loading up on defense stocks
International Advisor
Geopolitics pushes focus of Nordea Europe equity fund
1 excellent defence ETF to consider buying for a Stocks and Shares ISA
Here’s why BAE Systems’ share price just hit a 52-week high!
Money Magpie
How to Invest in European Defence Stocks in 2025
This is Money
How to profit from the rush to protect firms from M&S-style cyber attacks
Five ETFs for investors wanting to buy the defence boom
Portfolio Adviser
Five key takeaways from the Spring Statement
Financial Times
HANetf unveils Europe-focused defence ETF
ETF Stream
HANetf to launch Europe Defence ETF
HANetf seeks to build on giant defence ETF with European version
Private Investor’s Diary: I’m done with US stocks
The Trump effect: what the US president will do to your pension
Defence focused etf hits 1.5bn assets double this year
EU think-tank looks to ETFs to boost European defence companies
The Telegraph
Where to invest as Europe ramps up defence spending
The Guardian
Bitcoin slides below $90,000 amid crypto selloff; Tesla sales slide across Europe; UK defence stocks jump
How to get rich as Starmer finally commits to defending the nation
Apple cheers Trump with $500bn US investment plan; more losses on Wall Street – as it happened
Funds Europe
German election fuels market optimism amid defence shift
Rankia Pro
NATO aligned Future of Defence ETF Surpasses $1 Billion AUM Milestone
Europe stocks close lower; Schneider Electric shares rise 3% as record profit beats expectations
Looking for defence stocks to buy? Consider this brilliant ETF
Defence stocks rise as UK faces “generational challenge” on national security
Is there value in European equities?
Amid alarming talk of World War 3, here are four ways to protect YOUR wealth from global turmoil: JEFF PRESTRIDGE
Market optimism soars as Trump wins US presidency
It's a live issue: Why selectors keep being asked about defence
Invest in defence of the West! Financial experts reveal the stocks that could build you a war chest
Investment Officer
Investors are using defence ETFs as a ‘flight to safety’
Investors view defence stocks as ESG-compatible, show interest in active ETFs
Defence spending becomes “less of a problem” – even for ESG
Trustnet
The thematic ETF fund selectors are backing
Ukraine tactics are reshaping the defence industry
Defence ETFs battle as sector demand escalates
Defence ETFs for a changing macro narrative
Wealth DFM
NATO and the Geopolitical risks
Defence ETFs: A new way to protect portfolios?
Ten stocks to invest in NOW to profit from Rishi's defence spending boost
Why European defence stocks have surged ahead of US names
Moving beyond AI: Four themes to invest in for the next decade
Defence spending and nuclear power emerge as popular themes in Q1 2024
The best and worst funds of Q1 2024
At the XENIX ETF Special Awards UK 2024, the Future of Defence ETF (NATO) was crowned Best Innovative Newcomer ETF. The defence ETF, launched in July of last year, provides exposure to NATO and NATO+ ally defence and cyber defence spending. In only 8 months, the fund has accrued over $235 million assets under management (AUM).[1] [1] AUM accurate as at 19.03.2024.
Select Your Country
Select Your Investor Type
Choose a brokerage
IG
AJ Bell
Invest Engine
Hargreaves Lansdown
Aviva (D2C)
Bestinvest
Fidelity
Halifax
Interactive Investor
Trading 212
You are now leaving HANetf's website and accessing a third-party website. HANetf may provide access to information, products, or services offered on websites that are owned or operated by other companies ("third-party websites"). We provide this access through the use of hyperlinks that automatically move you from a HANetf website to the third-party site.
While we do our best to provide you with helpful, trustworthy resources, HANetf cannot endorse, approve, or guarantee information, products, services, or recommendations provided at a third-party website. Since we may not always know when information on a linked site changes, HANetf is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any third-party website. HANetf shall not be responsible for any loss or damage of any sort resulting from the use of a link on its websites nor will it be liable for any failure of products or services advertised or provided on these linked sites.
HANetf offers you links on an "as is" basis. When you visit a third-party website by using a link on a HANetf site, you will no longer be protected by the HANetf privacy policy or security practices. The data collection, use, and protection practices of the linked site may differ from the practices of HANetf sites. You should familiarize yourself with the privacy policy and security practices of the linked website. Those are the policies and practices that will apply to your use of the linked website, not the HANetf policies and practices.
Here are some tips to help you tell if you have left a HANetf website:
Important Notice: HANetf is a provider of Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) and Exchange Traded Commodities (ETCs). We do not sell investment products directly to individual investors. Our funds are available through regulated investment platforms and brokers. Our only official website is www.hanetf.com. Any other domain is not affiliated with or authorised by HANetf in any way. If you suspect fraudulent activity, please contact your local financial regulator and/or the police and report the website or individual involved.