Global Instability and the Future of European Energy Security

Published date: 13th March 2026 | Author: Jake Coulson

Executive summary

  • Europe’s energy security has been reshaped by rising geopolitical instability, from the war in Ukraine to renewed disruption in the Middle East.
  • Although Europe has reduced its reliance on Russian gas, it remains vulnerable to external shocks through seaborne energy imports.
  • Governments across Europe are responding by prioritising nuclear energy, renewables, critical resources, and infrastructure investment.
  • Nuclear power is regaining policy support because it can strengthen energy security and reduce exposure to supply-chain disruptions.
  • Renewables remain central to Europe’s long-term energy strategy, but their expansion depends on access to critical raw materials and stronger supply chains.
  • Copper and other strategic resources are becoming increasingly important as Europe expands electrification, grid infrastructure, and low-carbon energy generation.
  • The current investment case for European energy security is being driven less by environmental ambition alone and more by national resilience and strategic independence.

Why is geopolitical instability reshaping European energy security?

It is no secret that we are in the midst of greater geopolitical volatility. Trade wars and real wars are becoming more frequent, and political decision making is once again the key driver for global markets. The invasion of Ukraine in 2022 marked a turning point for European energy security, with Russia’s share of Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) supply falling from 40% to 13% as of early 2026. [1] While Europe has made significant progress in diversifying away from Russian gas – increasingly relying on U.S. imports, which accounted for 57% in 2025 –[2] a new more acute crisis has emerged.

On 28 February 2026, joint U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran triggered a military conflict that has produced “the largest supply disruption in the history of the global oil market”[3]. Iran retaliated with attacks on regional U.S. and allied bases, Israeli territory, and other Gulf States, while its Revolutionary Guard issued warnings prohibiting the flow of vessels through the Strait of Hormuz – through which approximately 20% of global daily oil supply and LNG normally transit – bringing commercial tanker traffic to a near standstill. Compounding this disruption, an Iranian attack on Qatar Energy’s Ras Laffan facility on 2 March forced an immediate shutdown of production, with the company temporarily relinquishing its LNG supply obligations.[4] As a result, European gas prices rose by as much as 45% in under a week.[5]

Europe entered this crisis from a position of weakness. 2025 LNG stores across the continent were far below 2023 and 2024 peaks at 62.5%,[6] meaning it was already being planned that imports would have to increase to support current levels. Europe’s hard-won diversification away from Russia has, in part, been replaced by a dependence on seaborne delivery, that are themselves susceptible to geo-political shock.  The urgency of the policies outlined, are rarely more apparent.

The graph below shows European dependence on natural gas imports.

Petroleum oil

*Y-axis shows an index of EU import prices for energy products where 2021=100, so values show percentage change relative to the 2021 average

Source: Eurostat database (Comext) and Eurostat estimates. For illustrative purposes only. Data as of: December 2025

 The upside of this bleak outlook is that European governments have recognised the seriousness of their reliance on imports and have begun instituting policies to improve energy security.

Pathways to improvement

Why is nuclear energy becoming more important for European energy security?

As Europe seeks to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels and improve energy security, nuclear energy is increasingly recognised as a critical solution for governments. Nuclear energy helps stabilise grid power through its fuel efficiency and the fact that most nuclear sites hold between 12-24 months of fuel on site, helps potentially mitigate the negative effects of supply chain disruptions. Many European countries are beginning to expand their nuclear energy capabilities, restart closed reactors, and invest in next-generation technologies such as Small Modular Reactors (SMRs).

France has long relied on nuclear power for over 70% of its electricity capacity.[7] In response to energy security concerns, France has begun expanding its nuclear generation even further. The ‘France 2030’ plan allocates €1 billion to develop SMRs by 2030.[8] France’s reliance on nuclear power significantly contributes to its energy independence, a policy of significant importance in the current geopolitical landscape.

The United Kingdom has also emphasised the importance of nuclear energy. As part of its energy strategy, the government has committed to provide 25% of expected electricity demand through nuclear power by 2050.[9] Construction is ongoing at two large scale reactors – Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C – aimed at reducing the UK’s reliance on imported energy. SMRs are also part of the UK’s plan; however, current priorities are focusing on the larger-scale sites.

Surprisingly, Germany has also begun to reconsider its stance on nuclear energy as a source of secure energy. Following the Fukushima accident in 2011, Germany like many other states, sought to phase out nuclear energy, but the conflict in Ukraine has forced the government to reconsider this stance. Following the invasion, the German government extended the operational life of its remaining reactors until April 2023 to limit the negative effects on the ensuing energy crisis. This expansion opened the door for debate about nuclear power, and as of May 2025, Germany considers nuclear power comparable to renewables for energy security purposes.[10]

Other nations across Europe are considering nuclear power’s role in energy security and decarbonisation: Italy’s Environment and Energy Security Minister said in May 2025 that he is convinced Italy will have nuclear power by 2030; as of May 2025, Denmark is considering an end to its 40-year ban on nuclear power; Belgium’s parliament voted to abandon plans to phase out nuclear power. And Spain has seen a resurrection of debate following a blackout in April 2025, which could lead to extensions on nuclear power beyond 2035.[11]

What role do renewables play in European energy security?

Renewable energy sources remain crucial for European energy security. In 2025, renewable energy represented 25% of total energy consumed in the EU.[12] Since then, a number of initiatives have been agreed to increase this number over the coming years. For instance, North Sea countries, including the UK, agreed to the ‘Hamburg Declaration’ in January 2026, aiming to deliver 300GW of offshore wind energy by 2050.[13] In January 2026, Germany and Denmark approved the ‘Bornholm Energy Island’ project to distribute offshore wind power.[14]

Why do critical resources matter for European energy security?

While European plans to accelerate decarbonisation and renewable usage are admirable. There are considerable barriers to development. Currently, China has a near monopoly on critical raw material exports to Europe, creating a dependency very susceptible to political or economic shock.

 The objective of European investment in energy security is not complete self-sufficiency, but diversification of its production methods to include both domestic production and international exports.

The European Commission is accelerating EU-relevant projects by de-risking investments and fast tracking permitting. The EU will mobilise €3 billion over the next year to projects that can provide alternative supplies.[15] While a short-term fix, the existence of these improvements is emblematic of the policy attention resource procurement is receiving.

Additionally, the EU is planning to deepen cooperation with geographically diverse and resource rich regions. The EU has launched negotiations with Brazil and is welcoming Canadian investment opportunities. By diversifying supply chains, Europe aims to reduce dependence and increase capacity to produce renewable energy.

One example of a material critical to Europe’s energy security is copper. European copper demand is estimated to increase 35% from 2020 to 2050,[16] driven in part by demand for wind turbines, solar panels, heat pumps, and electric vehicles. Meeting global electrification goals will require 115% more copper to be mined in the next 30 years than has been in all of human history.[17]

This supply-demand imbalance is being monitored closely by market participants. Copper demand could surge to 42 million tonnes by 2040.[18] The planned infrastructure upgrades highlight this narrative further; anticipated investment into Europe will total hundreds of billions of Euros, each megawatt of capacity requiring substantial copper.

Copper’s role extends beyond grid improvements. An electric vehicle requires 260% more copper than a traditional combustion engine vehicle.[19] Renewable energy infrastructure like wind farms and solar power require upwards of 7 times more copper than fossil fuel-based alternatives.[20] When Europe commits to the Hamburg Declaration of 300GW wind target or France’s expanded nuclear infrastructure, miners of copper will be direct beneficiaries of long-term contracts.

Why is energy infrastructure critical to Europe’s energy security?

While this renewed emphasis on nuclear power is of benefit to Europe, there must be equal emphasis placed on the infrastructure to secure energy across the region. Investment is being focused on closing the significant funding gap through a combination of public and private capital. To do this, several large-scale projects have been established. NextGenerationEU and InvestEU programmes will mobilise close to €1 trillion in funds to support green and digital transitions to substantiate rhetoric surrounding renewable and nuclear power production.[21][22]

Europe is working to create a more resilient supply chain. And the below graph illustrates the percentage of organisations that have invested in nearshoring most of their manufacturing or production.

Reshoring

Source: Aberdeen Investments, Capgemini. For illustrative purposes only. Data as of: 04.07.2025

What does the future hold for European energy security?

The durability of an investment in European infrastructure, copper mining or uranium mining is predicated on geopolitical reality rather than environmental optimism. Previous periods of motivation were focussed on the environmental benefits but suffered with economic downturns and political apathy. The current evolution is driven by energy security and independence from adversaries. Germany’s €500 billion commitment, and the UK’s construction of nuclear power plants reflects a recognition that energy security is a national security vulnerability. During a period of heightened tensions such as the current one, security is a priority that can provide a solid foundation far more resilient than previous motivations.

4 Sector Focussed ETFs

The convergence of geopolitical tensions, nuclear renaissance, and infrastructure investment has created a rare case of policy alignment and capital investment. For investors, this translates into four distinct opportunities.

European Infrastructure: GR8

The Making Europe Great Again UCITS ETF (GR8) is potentially well placed to benefit from this renewed emphasis on energy security. The fund’s European focus seeks to capture infrastructure improvements, and policy tailwinds. National commitments like Germany’s €500 billion injection and transnational agreements like the Hamburg Declaration create visibility that extends beyond 2050.

The engineering companies, equipment manufacturers, and construction companies are all essential for European infrastructure improvements. The fund’s policy sensitivity may be of benefit to investors, because of the medium- and long-term horizons of Europe’s outlook.

Uranium mining: URNM and URNJ

Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF (URNM) and Sprott Junior Uranium Miners UCITS ETF (URNJ) may stand to benefit from increased European investment in nuclear energy. Following years of underinvestment during the nuclear phase out, immediate demand is outpacing current supply. Reactor restarts and life span extensions require immediate supply, and the construction of new reactors. All of this means that current uranium inventories are being depleted, and uranium miners stand to benefit from this.

A distinguishing feature of both URNM and URNJ is their direct allocation to physical uranium, which provides additional benefits beyond pure mining equity exposure. While mining stocks can be affected by company specific issues such as regulatory delays and or project overspends, the physical uranium holdings respond to the spot price of the underlying commodity tied to the supply-demand fundamentals of the uranium market itself, thus providing some drawdown protection.

Physical Uranium: SPUT

The Sprott Physical Uranium ETC (SPUT) may also stand to be of benefit to investors by offering exposure to physical uranium without the operational risks associated with the miners. To achieve this the ETC holds the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust, which holds physical stock of uranium oxide in secure facilities across three different providers.

Copper Mining: CPPR

The Sprott Pure Play Copper Miners UCITS ETF (CPPR) provides targeted exposure to copper miners and stands to benefit as energy transition metals become increasingly crucial to European energy security. Copper is essential in every aspect of power grids, and the machinery required for clean energy and in each electric vehicle manufactured. As well as offering pure play exposure to copper mining companies, the fund also has access to the Sprott Physical Copper trust, this dual exposure to both the price of the underlying commodity and copper mining equities aims to reduce the potential performance contraction associated with traditional products.

Key Risks

GR8:

  • Geographical investment risk – The Fund invests a significant portion of its assets in the securities of a single country or region and the Fund’s performance is likely to be impacted by events or conditions affecting that country or region.
  • Sector concentration risk – Tactical allocation may overweight specific sectors (e.g., real estate, infrastructure, financials), increasing sensitivity to sector‑specific downturns.
  • Energy Sector Risk – Companies in energy-related industries can be significantly affected by fluctuations in energy prices and supply and demand of energy fuels.
  • There is no assurance that any appreciation in value of investments will occur, or the investment objective of the Fund will be achieved.

URMN and URNJ:

  • Energy Sector Risk – Companies in energy-related industries can be significantly affected by fluctuations in energy prices and supply and demand of energy fuels.
  • Mining Sector Risk – The exploration and development of mineral deposits involve significant financial risks over a significant period of time.
  • Metals and Mining Industry Risk – Companies in the metals and mining industry are susceptible to fluctuations in worldwide metal prices and extraction and production costs.
  • Sector concentration risk – Tactical allocation may overweight specific sectors (e.g., real estate, infrastructure, financials), increasing sensitivity to sector‑specific downturns.

SPUT:

  • Commodity Exposure Risk – The Fund invests in uranium companies, which may be susceptible to fluctuations in the underlying commodities market. Securities of companies held by the Fund that are dependent on a single commodity, or are concentrated on a single commodity sector, may typically exhibit even higher volatility attributable to commodity prices.
  • Mining Sector Risk – The exploration and development of mineral deposits involve significant financial risks over a significant period of time.
  • Uranium Companies Risk – Uranium companies may be significantly subject to the effects of competitive pressures and the price of uranium.
  • Sector concentration risk – Tactical allocation may overweight specific sectors (e.g., real estate, infrastructure, financials), increasing sensitivity to sector‑specific downturns.

CPPR:

  • Energy Sector Risk – Companies in energy-related industries can be significantly affected by fluctuations in energy prices and supply and demand of energy fuels.
  • Metals and Mining Industry Risk – Companies in the metals and mining industry are susceptible to fluctuations in worldwide metal prices and extraction and production costs.
  • Commodity Exposure Risk – The Fund invests in companies, which may be susceptible to fluctuations in the underlying commodities market. Securities of companies held by the Fund that are dependent on a single commodity, or are concentrated on a single commodity sector, may typically exhibit even higher volatility attributable to commodity prices.
  • Sector concentration risk – Tactical allocation may overweight specific sectors (e.g., real estate, infrastructure, financials), increasing sensitivity to sector‑specific downturns.

What does the future hold for European energy security?

The durability of an investment in European infrastructure, copper mining or uranium mining is predicated on geopolitical reality rather than environmental optimism. Previous periods of motivation were focussed on the environmental benefits but suffered with economic downturns and political apathy. The current evolution is driven by energy security and independence from adversaries. Germany’s €500 billion commitment, and the UK’s construction of nuclear power plants reflects a recognition that energy security is a national security vulnerability. During a period of heightened tensions such as the current one, security is a priority that can provide a solid foundation far more resilient than previous motivations.

[1] https://en.highnorthnews.com/politics/eu-approves-russian-gas-ban-in-decisive-break-with-moscow-including-arctic-lng/1101094#:~:text=New%20overreliance%20on%20US%20LNG,cent%20before%20the%20Ukraine%20war.&text=The%20EU%20has%20diversified%20its,on%20a%20single%20external%20supplier.

[2] [2] https://ieefa.org/resources/eu-risks-new-energy-dependence-us-could-supply-80-its-lng-imports-2030#:~:text=EU%20imports%20of%20US%20LNG,from%20the%20US%20in%202025.

[3] cfr.org/articles/how-the-iran-war-ignited-a-geoeconomic-firestorm#:~:text=The%20Narrow%20Strait%20That%20Broke%20the%20Global%20Energy%20Market&text=In%20just%20over%20two%20weeks,of%20the%20global%20oil%20market.

[4]https://www.qatarenergy.qa/en/MediaCenter/Pages/newsdetails.aspx?ItemId=3892#:~:text=Due%20to%20military%20attacks%20on,(LNG)%20and%20associated%20products.

[5] https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/european-gas-prices-jump-much-133612129.html

[6] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/infographics/gas-storage-capacity/#0

[7] https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/france

[8] https://onu-vienne.delegfrance.org/Nuclear-power-and-SMR-are-central-to-the-France-2030-investment-plan#:~:text=The%20%22France%202030%22%20plan%20is%20a%20large,the%20goal%20of%20small%2C%20innovative%20nuclear%20reactors.

[9] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-61010605#:~:text=The%20government%20announced%20that%20a,could%20my%20energy%20bills%20go?

[10] https://www.ft.com/content/e99efa2b-338a-4065-89c6-0683d5759ed7

[11] https://www.cnbc.com/2025/05/27/europe-pivots-back-to-nuclear-in-pursuit-of-more-energy-independence.html

[12] https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Renewable_energy_statistics

[13] https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-and-europe-sign-historic-pact-to-drive-clean-energy-future

[14] https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/denmark-germany-agree-bornholm-energy-island-wind-project-2026-01-26/

[15] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_2891

[16] https://hanetf.com/fund/cppr-sprott-pure-play-copper-miners-etf/

[17] https://www.ey.com/en_us/insights/mining-metals/coppers-role-in-the-energy-transition-grows-as-demand-surges

[18] https://finance.yahoo.com/news/copper-surges-in-unsustainable-rally-joining-silver-and-gold-in-2026-metals-frenzy-144259758.html

[19] https://internationalcopper.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2017.06-E-Mobility-Factsheet-1.pdf

[20] https://www.ey.com/en_us/insights/mining-metals/coppers-role-in-the-energy-transition-grows-as-demand-surges

[21] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/infographics/ngeu-covid-19-recovery-package/#:~:text=Total:%20%E2%82%AC750%20billion,Total%20grants:%20%E2%82%AC312.5%20billion

[22] https://investeu.europa.eu/investeu-programme/investeu-fund/about-investeu-fund/how-does-fund-work_en#:~:text=The%20InvestEU%20Fund%20is%20expected,and%20skills:%20%E2%82%AC2.8%20billion

IMPORTANT INFORMATION This document is approved for professional use only.

Communications issued in the UK

The content in this document is issued by HANetf Limited (“HANetf”) and approved by Privium Fund Management (UK) Limited (“Privium”). HANetf is an appointed representative of Privium, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. The registered office of Privium is The Shard, 24th Floor, 32 London Bridge Street, London, SE1 9SG

This communication has been prepared for professional investors, but the exchange traded product (“ETCs”) and exchange traded fund (“ETFs”) set out in this communication (“Products”) may be available in some jurisdictions to any investors. Please check with your broker or intermediary that the relevant Product is available in your jurisdiction and suitable for your investment profile.

Disclaimers

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The price of the Products may vary and they do not offer a fixed income. This document may contain forward looking statements including statements regarding our belief or current expectations with regards to the performance of certain assets classes. Forward looking statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. There can be no assurance that such statements will be accurate and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Therefore, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The content of this document is for information purposes and for your internal use only, and does not constitute an investment advice, recommendation, investment research or an offer for sale nor a solicitation of an offer to buy any Product or make any investment.

An investment in an exchange traded product is dependent on the performance of the underlying asset class, less costs, but it is not expected to track that performance exactly. The Products involve numerous risks including among others, general market risks relating to underlying adverse price movements in an Index (for ETFs) or underlying asset class and currency, liquidity, operational, legal and regulatory risks. In addition, in relation to Cryptocurrency ETCs, these are highly volatile digital assets and performance is unpredictable.

More Articles

Four key drivers behind copper’s growth opportunity

September 2026

Three things investors should consider before investing in uranium ETFs

September 2026

The Merits of Bottom-Up Investing

September 2026

El Niño’s ripple effects: How a strengthening pacific pattern is moving different asset classes

August 2026

The forces shaping crypto’s next move

August 2026

Buried Treasure: How Geopolitical Relief Could Unearth Mining Gains

August 2026

Canada beyond the headlines: the case for energy, financials, and real estate

August 2026

Beyond a Chatbot: How can emerging-market platforms monetise AI?

July 2026

Lloyd Capital Outlook

July 2026

Mag 7 to Lag 7: What a tech stumble says about the potential risks of investing in major indices

July 2026

Natural Gas – growing source of global energy and uncertainty

July 2026

What is the cost of rebuilding Ukraine?

June 2026

Why are central banks buying what they once sold?

June 2026

Defence 2.0: How Drones and Cyber are reshaping investments

June 2026

What investors should consider before investing in Defence ETFs in 2026

June 2026

Copper’s role in the world has shifted

June 2026

The quest for the perfect business

June 2026

How memory is the AI bottleneck

June 2026

What does AI mean for cyber defence?

June 2026

Do drones mean the death of defence primes?

June 2026

Computing’s next big disruption is already here

May 2026

Why can’t silver supply keep up with demand?

May 2026

How much will the US military spend on drones?

May 2026

What does the Iran war mean for travel and North American energy?

April 2026

Navigating geopolitics, energy security and structural demand

April 2026

Canada has what the world needs

March 2026

Ukraine could become the West’s solution for rearmament

March 2026

Iran crisis – four sectors to keep on your radar

March 2026

From tanks to code: why the next defence boom will be digital

February 2026

Why cybersecurity and defence may be complementary themes?

February 2026

Preferred shares and outlook for months ahead

February 2026

Next stop for global travel

February 2026

The new nuclear age – why physical uranium matters now

February 2026

Critical Commodities for 2026

February 2026

Reconciling responsibility with rearmament

January 2026

The New Age of Tech | Tech Megatrend Outlook 2026

January 2026

The Future of Emerging Markets: 2026 Market Outlook

January 2026

Shape of the Markets by PT Asset Management

October 2025

Nuclear Energy – why uranium is back in favour

September 2025

Copper’s less known demand driver: defence

September 2025

Indo-Pacific Rearmament: How much will defence budgets grow by 2030?

September 2025

How gold is custodied and why it should matter to investors

September 2025

Travel in 2025 – strong data drives growth

August 2025

Understanding covered call ETFs

August 2025

Different approaches to covered call ETFs

August 2025

The opportunity presented by volatility

August 2025

Heightened demand for defence in the pacific region

August 2025

Three drivers of the health care sector in 2025

August 2025

Equal weighted tech – an interview with Anthony Ginsberg

July 2025

Indo-Pacific Defence: What, Why and How?

July 2025

Magnificent 8 of India – High-growth tech stocks in India to watch

July 2025

The nuclear revival – a new dawn for uranium investment

June 2025

ETFs are getting active – is your portfolio ready?

May 2025

Three themes shaping the future of energy and ETFs to access them

May 2025

Sharpening the Blade: How traders use leveraged and short crypto ETPs

May 2025

Practical Uses for Leveraged and Short Crypto ETPs

April 2025

Why it is not too late for European defence

April 2025

Understanding Daily Leveraged and Short ETPs

April 2025

The basics of the covered call strategy: Potential income and capital growth

March 2025

Tariffs, Tensions and the Uranium Opportunity

March 2025

What would a US withdrawal from NATO mean for European defence?

March 2025

Holding case study: Rheinmetall

March 2025

Holding case study: Bae Systems

March 2025

Three themes that are reshaping the gold market

February 2025

ETFs Are Gaining Ground Over Mutual Funds

February 2025

Europe’s sidelining by US prompts defence spending reality check

February 2025

Will Europe be forced to defend itself alone?

December 2024

Uranium 2025: Opportunities in a Structurally Undersupplied Market

December 2024

Copper 2025: The Red Metal’s Next Chapter After a Year in the Black

December 2024

Midstream Energy: Dividend Growth and Natural Gas Demand Drive 2025 Outlook

December 2024

Emerging Markets 2025: The Rise of Digital and E-Commerce Giants

December 2024

2025: A Year for Disciplined Investing in an Uncertain World

December 2024

Health care’s Comeback: Why 2025 Could Revive the Sector’s Vital Signs

December 2024

Trump and Tech: M&A Revival, Trade Shifts, and the Rise of Automation

December 2024

Bitcoin’s Year Ahead: Why 2025 Could Be a Halving Hit

December 2024

Clear skies ahead: is the travel industry poised for takeoff in 2025?

December 2024

Golden Era: Why 2025 Could Shine Bright for Gold and Miners

December 2024

Global Equities Under Trump: A New Era of Tariffs, Taxes, and Uncertainty

December 2024

Europe rearms for a world of greater geopolitical risk

November 2024

US Election 2024: The Stakes for NATO and the Defence Industry

October 2024

Do the Mag 7 have too much influence over the S&P 500?

October 2024

Investors don’t care enough about recycled gold

October 2024

The Royal Mint: A Millennium in the Making

October 2024

Currency Hedged Physical Gold ETCs FAQs

October 2024

Why would you use an ETF over a mutual fund?

October 2024

Five companies leading India’s internet boom

September 2024

Can gold shine through the market turbulence

August 2024

Taking a U-turn: the world may be ready to embrace nuclear

June 2024

AI adds to positive natural gas outlook

June 2024

Copper – the defining metal of a new age

June 2024

Trump stance will force NATO countries to spend more whether elected or not

May 2024

The great travel industry rebound

May 2024

ESG Mining – Turning a brown industry greener

May 2024

ESG and defence investing: a balancing act

May 2024

Dominant Magnificent 7 could lose ground to broader tech rally

May 2024

The fall of Russian defence spending, and the rise of NATO

April 2024

The AI Revolution – a commodities play?

April 2024

Recycled gold and traceability

April 2024

Why investors should consider defence

April 2024

Copper’s new supercycle | Fresh highs and the long-term story

April 2024

Bitcoin in 2024 – a monumental year so far

March 2024

Gold price rallies but miners need to catch up

March 2024

Investing in India’s rise – what makes India an ideal emerging market?

February 2024

Global instability – three potential ways to hedge

February 2024

Energy Transition: The Metal Elephant in the Room

January 2024

HANetf’s 2024 Outlook

December 2023

Two Ways to Invest in Low-carbon Gold

March 2023

US ETFs are not the only ETF wrapper with a tax advantage; Irish domiciled ETFs have one too!

March 2023

Making Gold sustainable with HANetf’s Recycled Gold ETC and ESG Gold Mining ETF

February 2023

Article | There is no Walt Disney Company in crypto yet…

January 2023

Gold Shining in 2023?

January 2023

HANetf 2022 wrap up and outlook for 2023: Where did the inflows go?

January 2023

Key Dates for Digital Assets in 2022

January 2023

Article | The Merge and Ethereum – what you need to know

September 2022

Article | Why small ETFs are not necessarily less liquid

February 2022

Solar Energy 101 | Understanding the Solar Energy UCITS ETF

June 2021

The Royal Mint ESG Credentials

May 2021

Six Things to Know about Investing in a Gold ETC

August 2020

The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC (RMAU) Frequently Asked Questions

April 2020

The Importance of the Physical Gold ETC Custodian | RMAU

March 2020

Responsible Gold Bars & Physical Redemption | RMAU | The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC

March 2020

How to Buy