Silver ETF Report | August 2026

Key Takeaways

Silver extended its decline in July, easing another $1.00 per ounce, or -1.71%, to close at $57.60. The move left silver down -19.63% year-to-date, a reflection of its inherently higher volatility rather than any shift in the underlying story. What stood out was less the size of the drop than the contrast with gold, which stabilized at the $4,000 support level and edged 0.95% higher on the month. Silver rarely moves in isolation from gold, and July underscored the point. Both metals remain tethered to the same macro engine, a shifting Fed rate path and the direction of the U.S. dollar, but silver consistently amplifies those forces. In a smaller and more leveraged market, it tends to overshoot in both directions.[1]

The pullback rattled sentiment but did little to the underlying picture, which still rests on tight supply meeting rising demand. Silver has run a structural deficit for several years, steadily drawing down above-ground inventories, and with few sizeable new mines in the pipeline, output stays relatively unresponsive to price even as demand keeps building. Industrial appetite for silver is underpinned by solar manufacturing, the broader electrification push, electric vehicles, AI infrastructure, data centres and an expanding list of other technology uses. Many of these end markets should hold up even if the wider economy loses momentum, precisely because they are anchored by policy-driven investment cycles rather than discretionary spending that ebbs and flows with the business cycle.

Silver’s monetary dimension is really an extension of gold’s, and it could matter more than many assume. The forces repricing gold as a strategic reserve asset, rising sovereign debt, persistent fiscal deficits, central bank diversification away from the dollar and a fragmenting geopolitical landscape, are the same forces that have historically lifted silver whenever confidence in paper currencies wavers.

However, the two metals are also beginning to diverge in an instructive way. Through July, gold steadied while silver continued to drift, leaving silver cheaper relative to gold than it was at the start of the year. Gold typically finds its footing first, supported by steady official-sector buying that establishes a durable floor beneath the market. Silver instead leans on its structural deficit and industrial demand for support. Encouragingly, silver ETF buying resumed in July even as the price lagged, an early sign that investor flows may be starting to follow gold’s lead.

The bottom line is that the first seven months of 2026 have demonstrated that cyclical corrections are a normal feature of secular bull markets. Notably, silver’s July drift came even as the dollar softened, underscoring that the move was a continuation of leveraged unwinding and weak sentiment rather than any deterioration in supply or demand. With the dollar headwind now easing and gold already stabilizing, the same structural forces that were obscured during the sell-off stand to reassert themselves.

Macro Outlook

Silver’s long-term outlook is no longer solely defined by its historical role as a high-beta companion to gold. It is being reshaped by a convergence of structural forces including energy security imperatives, accelerating solar deployment, the broader electrification push, and the embedding of silver into critical infrastructure that is difficult to substitute and politically difficult to reverse. The result is a market in which silver demand is increasingly anchored by policy-driven investment cycles, rather than by discretionary industrial consumption that ebbs and flows with the business cycle.

Supply, by contrast, has barely moved. Mine production has been effectively flat for a decade even as prices climbed, largely because most silver is produced as a byproduct of lead, zinc, copper and gold operations, where producers have little incentive to flex output when silver rallies.[2] The result has been years of consecutive market deficits,[3] bridged only by drawing down above-ground inventories that are now materially depleted. With few sizeable new mines in the pipeline, supply stays relatively unresponsive to price even as demand keeps building.

For pure-play silver miners, this backdrop has generated AISC margins that are unprecedented over the past decade, with all-in sustaining costs sitting well below the prevailing spot price. That margin profile gives investors meaningful operating leverage to silver, which is why silver miners have generally outperformed in silver bull markets.

The constructive supply backdrop does not come without volatility. Speculative positioning, leveraged derivative flows, and concentrated activity by large trading entities have amplified short-term price swings, creating a tug of war between fundamental buyers and tactical speculators. However, these dislocations sit on top of a market that has undergone a meaningful re-rating, driven by years of accumulated undervaluation and the continuously deepening structural supply deficit. In this context, near-term turbulence is better understood as part of an ongoing adjustment process rather than a reversal of the broader macro thesis.

[1] Source : Bloomberg. Data as of 31.07.2026

[2] Source: Sprott Asset Management

[3] https://silverinstitute.org/global-silver-investment-to-remain-strong-in-2026-against-the-backdrop-of-a-sixth-consecutive-annual-market-deficit/

IMPORTANT INFORMATION This document is approved for professional use only.

Communications issued in the UK

The content in this document is issued by HANetf Limited (“HANetf”) and approved by Privium Fund Management (UK) Limited (“Privium”). HANetf is an appointed representative of Privium, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. The registered office of Privium is The Shard, 24th Floor, 32 London Bridge Street, London, SE1 9SG

This communication has been prepared for professional investors, but the exchange traded product (“ETCs”) and exchange traded fund (“ETFs”) set out in this communication (“Products”) may be available in some jurisdictions to any investors. Please check with your broker or intermediary that the relevant Product is available in your jurisdiction and suitable for your investment profile.

Disclaimers

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. The price of the Products may vary and they do not offer a fixed income. This document may contain forward looking statements including statements regarding our belief or current expectations with regards to the performance of certain assets classes. Forward looking statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. There can be no assurance that such statements will be accurate and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Therefore, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. The content of this document is for information purposes and for your internal use only, and does not constitute an investment advice, recommendation, investment research or an offer for sale nor a solicitation of an offer to buy any Product or make any investment.

An investment in an exchange traded product is dependent on the performance of the underlying asset class, less costs, but it is not expected to track that performance exactly. The Products involve numerous risks including among others, general market risks relating to underlying adverse price movements in an Index (for ETFs) or underlying asset class and currency, liquidity, operational, legal and regulatory risks. In addition, in relation to Cryptocurrency ETCs, these are highly volatile digital assets and performance is unpredictable.

How to Buy